Huh?

The Supreme Court is debating Ten Commandment displays today.

“If an atheist walks by, he can avert his eyes,” Justice Anthony Kennedy (news – web sites) said in a courtroom filled with spectators, many of whom could be seen glancing at the court’s frieze of Moses carrying the tablets.

Wow. This opens up some avenues, doesn’t it? Public decency laws are out; if someone flashes some kids on the steet it’s not a crime, they can avert their eyes! The FCC can’t regulate the content of broadcast TV, because you can just turn it off. Vandalism is ok now, just don’t look at your graffiti covered window and it isn’t there!

I propose we put a statue of Bertrand Russell holding a sign saying “Christianity is wrong” in a courthouse. The Christians can just avert their eyes.

Banning the Texas display might “show hostility to religion,” he said.

Riiiiight. When did neutrality become hostility?

“It’s a profoundly religious message, but it’s a profoundly religious message believed in by a vast majority of the American people,” Scalia said.

It seems to me that statement should scare the hell out of anyone who believes in republican principles. I’m fairly sure the majority isn’t supposed to be able to trample the rights of the minority. That statement is awfully close to that idea.

About these ads
Categories: Church and State
  1. Lina
    March 3, 2005 at 10:58 pm | #1

    Wow. Terrifying.

  1. March 2, 2005 at 10:45 pm | #1
  2. March 3, 2005 at 11:00 pm | #2

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: